Skip to content
Alpha Edge Investing

Alpha Edge Investing

"Investors operate with limited funds and limited intelligence, they don’t need to know everything. As long as they understand better than others, they have an edge.” – George Soros

  • Home
  • Earnings Updates/ Corporate Actions
  • Research – Equities
  • Research – Fixed Income/ Bonds
  • Research – Unit Trust/ ETF
  • News
  • My Opinions/ Views
  • Others
  • About Me
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Community and Support Forums
  • Toggle search form

CIMB: China Banks (Neutral)

Posted on July 25, 2022July 25, 2022 By alanyeo No Comments on CIMB: China Banks (Neutral)

Highlighted Companies

Bank of China ADD, TP HK$4.20, HK$2.76 close

We like BOC’s exposure to a rising US rate hike cycle via its HK subsidiary. We also like its inexpensive valuations (lowest of the big four banks FY22F P/BV ratio) and its high FY22F dividend yield (highest of big four banks).

China Merchants Bank ADD, TP HK$84.10, HK$42.20 close

CMB is our top sector pick. We believe that its ROE and better-than-peers net profit will be sustained, driven by its retail banking operations. We think continued rising ROE under the new president could be a re-rating catalyst.

Ping An Bank ADD, TP Rmb22.70, Rmb13.01 close

PAB is a key beneficiary of the ongoing recovery in credit card asset quality. It could also benefit notably from any loss of market share for fintech players given a stricter fintech regulatory environment.

Mortgage defaults: Insights from Jun’s MBS

  • There is little sign of overdue mortgage pressure from Jun 2022 monthly MBS data (Fig 1), which is a marked contrast to early 2020.
  • This suggests mortgage boycotts have yet to have any significant impact on overall mortgage defaults and is consistent with bank disclosures (Fig 4).
  • We remain unconcerned about the direct financial impact of mortgage NPLs on bank profits under our stress test (Fig 9) of materially higher default rates.
  • Our key concern remains flow-on impact to other sectors, with construction previously identified as an area facing stress. Retain Neutral rating on sector.

Jun MBS data: No signs of a pickup in overdue formation rates

We do not see any sign of a pickup in Jun 2022’s monthly mortgage overdue formation rates (comprising less than 30 days overdue) (Fig 1), which contrast with the significant rise of this ratio in early-2020 during the onset of the pandemic. Our analysis is based on data from mortgage-backed-securities (MBS) issued by CCB, China’s largest mortgage lender among state-owned-enterprise (SOE) banks and CMB, China’s largest mortgage lender among joint-stock banks. This is despite recent newsflow suggesting a marked pickup in mortgage defaults relating to new and uncompleted properties. This conclusion is consistent with the 15 banks that had disclosed their exposure to mortgage boycotts on 15-16 Jul 2022 amounting only to an average of 0.004% of 1Q22 total loans, with CMB the lowest at 0.0002% of 1Q22 loans (Fig 4).

Minimal profit impact under stress test to banks under our coverage

Even assuming worst-case 20% default rates among both property developers and relevant mortgage exposure for the banks under our coverage, the group NPL ratio impact averages to 0.29%, the group credit cost averages to only 0.08% of loans and the net profit impact averages to only 4% of FY22F net profits, before any offset via provisioning buffers (Fig 9). As a percentage of 1Q22 provisioning buffers, this only equates to an average of 6%. This is consistent with our view that investors should be unconcerned about the direct financial impact of these mortgage boycotts (see CMB: Time to address misconceptions, dated 14 Jul 2022).

But need to watch for flow-on impact

We are more cautious about possible flow-on indirect impact from these mortgage boycotts, with supply chains to developers and small companies more vulnerable. We had previously identified construction firms as facing greater credit quality stress in Corporate NPLs: Views from another angle, dated 24 Jun 2022 (Fig 21), with this segment comprising only 2% on average of bank loans (Fig 22).

Top picks: CMB-H, PAB, CITIC-H and BOC-H

We retain a Neutral rating on China’s banking sector. We value the banks using a stress test adjusted GGM. Upside/downside risks: better-/worse-than-expected economy and increase/decrease in policy risks.

China-BanksClick here to Download Full Report in PDF

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
Research - Equities Tags:bank of china, China Banks, China Economics, china economy, China Macro, China Market, China Merchants Bank, China Property, China Strategy, Ping An Bank

Post navigation

Previous Post: China Galaxy: Kweichow Moutai – Add Target Price RMB2,218
Next Post: CIMB: Malaysia Autos (Neutral)

Related Posts

China’s Economy in 2023 My Opinions/ Views
Are We Near the End of the Current Bear Market? My Opinions/ Views
UOBKH: Economic Activity China Research - Equities
Nomura: China Banks Research - Equities
UOBKH: Consumer – China (Overweight) Research - Equities
DBS: China data preview – GDP gain masks underlying weakness Research - Equities
CIMB: China Banks (Neutral) Research - Equities
DBS: China Banks Research - Equities
DBS: China Property Sector Research - Equities
DBS: China Property Weekly Digest Research - Equities
DBS: China Banks News
DBS: China/ Hong Kong Market Focus Research - Equities

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password
Get new posts by email
Chat on WhatsApp
  • Earnings Updates/ Corporate Actions
  • My Opinions/ Views
  • News
  • Others
  • Research – Equities
  • Research – Fixed Income/ Bonds
  • Research – Unit Trusts/ ETF

Copyright © 2023 Alpha Edge Investing.

Powered by PressBook Grid Blogs theme